Microsoft tells users to beware upgrading from Vista to Windows 7
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 14.9.2009
Tip: Click here to update all your PC's outdated driversMicrosoft said Friday that some "in-place" upgrades from Windows Vista to the new Windows 7 may take some users over 20 hours to complete.
The best that users can hope for is a 1 hour and 24 minute process, said Chris Hernandez, who works in the Windows deployment team, in a company blog published Friday.
So called "clean" installs, where the user overwrites an existing edition of Windows to end up with the OS, but no former data or applications, take less time: from 27 to 46 minutes.
Hernandez said the in-place upgrade times were obtained from lab machines in three different configurations, labeled low, mid-range and high-end, with three simulated users: a medium user, a heavy user and a super user. The profiles differed in the amount of data and the number of applications that were on the PC before the upgrade to Windows 7.
The medium user profile, for example, assumed 70GB of data and 20 applications. The super user profile, on the other hand, contained 650GB of data and 40 applications.
"One of the main goals with Windows 7 in general has been to be better than Vista," explained Hernandez on the blog. "As part of the Windows Upgrade team we have tracked Windows 7 upgrade performance using Vista as our baseline comparison."
Microsoft's goal, he added, was to make an in-place upgrade from Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) to Windows 7 at least 5% faster than an in-place upgrade from Vista SP1 to a new copy of Vista SP1.
Hernandez claimed Microsoft's testing showed, "that Windows 7 upgrade time is faster or equal within a 5% threshold to the Vista SP1 upgrade time." A table published in his blog post showed that in every situation, a Windows 7 upgrade was more than 5% faster than one using Vista.
But the data also illustrated that many of the in-place upgrade scenarios took an extremely long time. Of the 16 scenarios, three each for medium and heavy profiles, two for the super profile, with the tests run for both the 32- and 64-bit versions of Windows 7, only four clocked in at less than two hours, and only eight in under three hours.
source:
msfn.org
>> Click Here to Run a Free Scan for PC Errors <<
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
IE users beware: Zero-day attacks || Windows 7 - 100% legal activation with video and Upgrading from build 7229 to 7264 || Microsoft to supply ALL patches to All users || European XP, Vista users to pick browser || Will business users bite on Windows 7?
Comments(13)
the beware is for the time it takes, not that there is a problem, as the title suggest...
if you back up your sh!t u can do a clean install, which is always better. f.u. m$
that title is sooo leading i had to stop and think, oomg, what stupid fcuk wrote that?
wtf, fix that sh!t
well if it takes 20hrs, then that shows what a p.o.s. vista was. it didnt take 20hrs to
go from xp to vista, guess much wasnt fixed then!
i upgraded from vista business sp2 to 7 professional rtm and the operation went smoothly.
come on guys, we all know i could never get the estimated time remaining gizmo to work
correctly....give a guy a break...or another ten years.
always do a clean install.
i have a p4 computer with a 1tb hard drive fulled with around 800mbof data it never took
that long and ive tested it 3 times. please noted i only tested it to prove these lot
wrong i hate vista i spit on it.
i meant to say 800gb for the picky ones before i get moaned at for spelling lol
ok i have activated 7 ultimate with hazars crack.
how can i put windows update
into software restriction policies so no-one can f**k it up by doing an update???
type gpedit.msc in run box
thanks bsm i found it :)
ko ko ko je ko lapa tapa sapa
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
Wrong Title, again
By Gaevs on 14.09.2009 - 23:09