• Windows 7 Wallpapers
• Vista Wallpapers
• Windows Wallpapers

The Seattle Times provides a synopsis of the suit:

“Emma Alvarado bought a laptop from Lenovo on June 20, 2008, with Windows Vista Business preinstalled. She paid Lenovo ‘an additional $59.25 in order to ‘downgrade’ her operating system to Windows XP Professional.’ Alvarado is seeking class-action status.”

I’m curious who set the price point for the downgrade. And if it was Lenovo, why isn’t Alvarado suing Lenovo instead of Microsoft? Here’s how the complaint lays out the reasoning:

“Consumers have encountered numerous problems using the Vista operating system, and these problems have been widely publicized in various media outlets. As a result, many consumers would prefer to purchase a new computer pre-installed with the Windows XP operating system or at least not pre-installed with the Vista operating system. However, Microsoft has used its market power to take advantage of consumer demand for the Windows XP operating system by requiring consumers to purchase computers pre-installed with the Vista operating system and to pay additional sums to ‘downgrade’ to the Windows XP operating system.”

The complaint says Microsoft initially made the “downgrade” option available to users for $104 for a limited period of time - until June 30, 2008 — but then extended the time period until January 31, 2009 and then July 31, 2009. Yes, Microsoft’s constantly shifting XP-downgrade cutoff dates have been a source of endless confusion and mixed messages about Vista’s readiness. But, again, was it Microsoft making the downgrade option available for $104 or Lenovo? (And if it was Lenovo passing on Microsoft’s charge to PC makers, that distinction is worth noting.)

Microsoft officials have said before that it is up to PC makers as to how and whether they offered XP downgrades to end users.

I’ve asked Microsoft if it has any additional points to make regarding its Vista-to-XP downgrade policies.