Vista: Two Years Later
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 1.12.2008
Tip: Click here to update all your PC's outdated driversWindows Vista's second birthday passed, and nobody noticed. Some kids sleep anxiously for fear parents will forget the big birthday. Two years ago yesterday, Microsoft launched Windows Vista for businesses.
There was no fanfare, no obligatory look-back posts in commemoration—not even from Microsoft employee bloggers. Oh my, what has Vista become?
Windows Me II.
Microsoft has moved on already to Vista's successor, and it's not even released. Sadly, nobody wants to celebrate Windows Vista but forget it. Many enterprises are committed to Windows XP and sticking with it.
According to recent Gartner numbers, little more than 10 percent of businesses have deployed Windows Vista. That's not exactly a whopping endorsement two years and one service pack after release of a new Windows version businesses waited more than five years for.
At Windows Vista's launch two years ago, Gartner forecast that early Vista deployments would begin in earnest by the fourth quarter of 2007 and reach threshold by the second quarter of 2008. There was plenty of pent-up demand for it. But early reviews and troublesome enterprise test deployments quelled Vista interest. A year ago, Gartner revised its projections, with mainstream enterprise adoption tracking for early 2009. Many businesses will now never move to the Vista called Vista but to the version called Windows 7.
Seven builds off Windows Vista. Microsoft isn't looking to reinvent the operating system, but to get beyond Vista's bad rap. Strange then that Windows 7 will be Vista made over.
About two months ago I blogged: "Windows Vista No Longer Matters". To that post, Microsoft Watch reader Mike Renna commented:
"I've barely touched Vista—I just can't deal with learning and teaching clients (I do IT consulting) where things they've used for years with XP are now. Where's the start button? Why did it change? Etc. My docs folder? Now pics are in their own folder. There's a users and docs and settings folder tree now, right? Too confusing for my feable brain. I'd like to look forward to 7, but if it's based on Vista, what's keeping it from inheriting Vista's bad rep? Get rid of the bloat, make it lean and mean and stop moving things around.
As I've repeatedly asserted, perception is everything in business. Mike asks the right question: What will keep Windows 7 "from inheriting Vista's bad rep?" For starters, Microsoft is better managing the message and pulled off some early good reviews.
But Vista problems are persistent because people continue to have bad experiences with the operating system. To the same post, commenter Thomas exasperated:
Vista has been the most frustrating and annoying computing experience ever. Never has a product filled me so much rage. I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to pick my machine up and throw it at the wall. The solution? Keep a book near my Vista machine so I can quickly grab something to read while I wait out the 1-3 minute Vista freeze that happens 10-15 times a day.
This kind of user testimonial is akin to Windows anti-marketing, which is something Microsoft wouldn't want preparing the market for Seven.
Other Vista users have had more positive experiences, after bad Vista rap lowered expectations. Jess Meats commented to "Is Seven for Real or Just More Empty Vista Promises?":
I like Vista. Admittedly, I came late to the party. When I upgraded my home laptop, I went for one that still had XP because I'd heard all the negative press - without ever trying Vista myself. So, when work gave me a laptop with Vista on, SP1 had already been released and the major issues fixed. Having come to Vista post SP1, I can't see why everyone is complaining. This laptop loads up much faster than my XP one, shuts down incredibly fast, works fast, has a nicer UI and a really easy and useful search tool in the start menu.
source:
microsoft-watch.com
>> Click Here to Run a Free Scan for PC Errors <<
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Gmail is 5 years old today || Sony sees first loss in 14 years || Microsofts profits drop for first time in 23 years || Instant Change Vista Product ID with Vista ProductID Changer || x64 Vista SP2 JPG Rendering Performance Inferior to x86 Vista SP2's
Comments(11)
doesnt and never has happened to me. crapware from computer manafactures or spyware?
clean install of vista and never encountered any problems
i have some old software/s that doesn't work on vista. xp sp2 is the best!
nocturnus : geeee.... and it won't be working with windows 7 too ? get over it.
move along.
pure anti-ms fud. vista is good, you just need to use your brainz.
by the time windows 7 hits store shelves, vista premium ready computers will have been on
the market long enough for most people to have already bought one. since windows 7 is not
going to be any more of a strain on hardware than vista, then vista computers are already
capable of running windows 7. as long as microsoft never mentions vista in the same
sentence as windows 7, people will become convinced it's way better than vista.
vista is great, nothing that people say on stupid sites like this will change that fact
:)
it's pretty safe to say vista has failed no matter how "good" anyone thinks it is.
i've used it pre-sp1 and post-sp1, and was not impressed with either. vista starts and
shuts down slower than my xp machine... not to mention has 20+ more processes running and
uses 4x the amount of resources. sp1 fixed the major issues with it, but the overall
design was poor (which is why ms is now ignoring vista and trying to correct its problems
with windows 7).
i think windows 7 will be the true vista (the one that was
suppose to be released 2 yrs ago). i still think ms rushed vista out because of the length
of time between operating system more so than the "completeness" of the product.
pure anti-ms fud? prezi are you stupid? xp is made by ms! think twice before you write
something like this
i don't need to worry about upgrading my toshiba xp notebook to vista because toshiba
and microsoft certified that my notebook can't be upgraded.
yes vista boots slow on old hardware that was made for xp...
i never had any problems with my pc running vista. i just made sure before i installed
vista my hardware can handle it, try it on a upgraded hardware and see if there's a
difference.
there is absoluting nothing wrong with vista, nor ms for forcing the computer industry
and users to get off their old oss and upgrade their hardware. the majority of people who
slam vista have never even seen it! what they have seen is the mac commericals doing an
excellent job of smearing the company that gave them the money to continue doing business
in the first place. (major props apple...) the fact that people talk about hangups and
delays with vista is ridiculous. the damn thing runs smooth! much more then what i can
say for that damn rainbow of death on the osx system. i've never seen a computer hang up
and crash more often then osx...reguardless of the version.
if i do have to
complain about one thing with vista it's the repair options. when that thing breaks, and
the 'repair my computer' doesn't work...it's clean install time. very frustrating!
that aside....long live ms. keep it up ms, vista 2 (win7) is amazing, light
and loads very quickly and that's just the pre-beta. i can't wait for the actual
release.
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
Freezing problems 15 times a day
By Will on 02.12.2008 - 01:12