KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Has Windows Vista's UAC feature failed Microsoft?


section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 20.5.2008

Experts agree that Microsoft's Windows Vista is relatively well-protected, but its security features — such as User Account Control (UAC) — have been highlighted by security experts as one reason why the operating system is far less popular than its predecessor, Windows XP.




According to Scott Charney, vice president of Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing Group, UAC was designed to give users more control over the applications they run and help them make better security decisions by providing them with more information.

However, the main problem with Vista's UAC, according to Charney, is that it prompts the user far too often.

"Clearly there has to be work done on UAC user prompts, where users get prompts at times they don't necessarily expect it — and it's not intuitive. The challenge is — as with many of these things when we try to give users control — if you give people too many prompts in too many situations, they view it as an impediment," Charney told ZDNet.com.au yesterday at the AusCERT security conference on the Gold Coast.

Mikko Hypponen, F-Secure's chief research officer, said although security features in Windows Vista are impressive, UAC remains a problem.

"There's not much we can criticise in Vista's security. Microsoft did a good job. UAC is not a bad idea by itself, but I don't see any way you could implement it in a way so it doesn't buck the user," said Hypponen.

In a recent survey, security vendor PC Tools discovered that out of 1,000 Vista-based PCs, 639 had been infected by malware in the previous six months. The company's managing director Simon Clausen blamed the high rate of infection on users that had switched off UAC because it was so annoying: "The majority of machines we see have UAC turned off if the user knows how to do it," he said.

The difficulty with UAC, according to F-Secure's Hypponen, is that Microsoft assumes the user should have administrator rights, an issue that Mac- and Linux-based systems dealt with a long time ago.

"Most Linux installations will say that you must create a user account. The big difference between a Mac and Vista is that, by default, on a Mac, you're not an administrator. On a Mac you only get prompted for root password when you're installing an application. Under Vista this happens a lot more because you have admin rights, so the UAC pops up often. Vista installation should end with [mandatory creation of] a user account with user access rights, not administrator rights," said Hypponen.

Microsoft's Charney said that UAC was Microsoft's first attempt to break away from its tradition of users being an administrator by default.

"Part of the reason UAC exists is we've been pushing people to the standard computing model. When you're an administrator on a machine, you have these all-powerful rights that also allow malware to do bad things. Increasingly we want people to be standard users.

"At the same time, there are times you need to be elevated to administrator to install programs. UAC was an attempt to say let's run a standard but when you need a higher level of privilege, rather than doing that silently, let's involve the user in that decision. Clearly we have to do more work in this area," Charney added.

source: zdnet.com.au

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Try the Xbox 360 Pants!
next article >>
Windows 7 on Steroids – Next-Generation Performance Boosters

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Disabling UAC Slows Vista's Bootup Time? || Vista SP1 and XP SP3 Have Failed to Break the Market's Windows Fatigue || Microsoft releases first Windows Vista Feature Pack || Dear Microsoft: Please get UAC right this time || Microsoft Exec: UAC Designed To Annoy Users

Comments(6)

Why complicate things.

By nick on 21.05.2008 - 02:05
microsoft should not have uac in windows 7, instead they should just have a note that pops up on boot along the lines of,

if you download illegal content, pron or open email attachments you will probably get a virus.
if you use internet explorer or mozilla firefox you will get tracking cookies or worse. if your pc is connected to a phone line a hacker could gain control of your pc or steal your personal details even if you use a firewall. a computer is only truly protected when it is turned off, unplugged and disconnected from a phone line.

maybe they could then list what they like to call “acceptable spyware”

Dummy people

By LL on 21.05.2008 - 16:05
uac is not the problem, its third party software. which is software that uses admin control to run simple things..
i have uac turned on na dhardly ever get any prompts from it...



Dumb people is right

By User on 21.05.2008 - 21:05
i also have no problems with uac on. not sure what peoples problems are?

oh yea, they are morons and immediately hate on vista

Easy to turn off..

By Capeman on 22.05.2008 - 00:05
just go to control panel/user accounts/turn user account control on or off, turn it off, restart and no more annoying shit. also microsoft should let the users decide if they want it on or off after the setup when you select if you want automatic updates or not.

Disable UAC

By lawl on 22.05.2008 - 04:05
how hard is it to disable uac? it's one little check box. uncheck it if you don't like it. quit bitching about something that can be disabled with one checkbox.

people just like to bitch.

why not based on peripheral activity?

By craig on 25.05.2008 - 06:05
why not have uac only activate if something requires admin access that wasn't initiated by a mouse click or keypress. for example, if you install something and click "next" the computer knows that you just clicked it, so it doesn't bother you unless it is of a known security concern. however, if spyware is making changes in the background, the computer sees there was no user feedback, and prompts for your attention.


No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Forum