KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

AMD Phenom X3 processor family performance


section: common, for your questions: KezNews forum, 6.5.2008

For the most part of last year, there were scarce good news to report from AMD. It wasn't until the end of the year that new Radeon graphics cards were out, and the eagerly awaited Phenom processors were launched.




Unfortunately for AMD, it was a rocky start with the quad-cores that never really had a chance against the speedier and should we say, bug-free Intel Core 2 Quads.

Nevertheless, AMD known for its fighting underdog spirit, has now relaunched the Phenom with the B3-stepping, which we looked at just recently. The B3-stepping has not exactly breathed new life into the Phenom processors, but it has given AMD a chance to regroup and retarget its products, forcedly aiming at cheaper and more affordable Intel processors.

This being the case, it is now possible to purchase an AMD 2.5GHz quad-core processor for just $235. At this price point, the Phenom X4 9850 can deliver an impressive level of performance.

While the battle to conquer the high-end enthusiast market never took place, AMD is fighting hard to make a reasonable impression in the mid-range (mainstream) market. Just recently they sent in some reinforcements to help tackle the lower end spectrum.

The latest processor series from AMD is a little unusual as it makes use of not one, two, or even four cores, but rather three! That’s right, the new Phenom X3 carries an unusual core configuration, and I guess the question most of you are probably asking yourselves (as we did) is why? The most reasonable explanation is that this still allows AMD to sell Phenom X4 processors with a defective core, minimizing their loss. Second, it gives some leverage for AMD to compete with Intel’s dual-core processors, being able to pull the "additional core" card.

But is that really so? To some, one of the biggest downfalls of the Phenom X4 series is that it was pitched as a quad-core solution. Because the software market still has to mature to accommodate quad-core processors (and sometimes even dual cores) a vast majority of applications won't see huge benefits out of the extra cores. Games in particular are known for not scaling appropriately beyond two cores, at least the current generation of titles. Not surprisingly then, gamers were most disappointed to find the Phenom X4 was playing second best to a strong line-up of dual-core Intel processors.

However it's hardly all about games in the world of processors, and when you look at how the Phenom X4 performs in business-type applications, it doesn't fare bad at all. Yet still, at this point in time dual-core processors scale better and sell in larger numbers, and AMD was in need of a boost to take on the Intel Core 2 Duo, hence the new Phenom X3 series.

The Phenom X3 family consists of three new processors: the 8450 (2.10GHz), 8650 (2.30GHz) and 8750 (2.40GHz).

source: techspot.com

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Mac OS 10.5.2 = Vista made in Apple?
next article >>
Don't slipstream XP sp3 on Windows Vista!

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
AMD releases Phenom processors || Will AMD Barcelona kill off high-margin AMD CPUs? || Sun leaks 6-core Intel processor details || Microsoft Office family 2007 Service Pack 1 download NOW || Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 Quad-Core Processor

Comments(4)

WHO CARES

By AMH on 07.05.2008 - 08:05
if you wanna a low budget cpu which consists more than two cores.
intel q6600 will take out the most solid of amd triple and quad core cpus..
i like amd and i support them more than intel. but truth hurts

Haha AMD

By anon on 07.05.2008 - 13:05
just die already faggots, noone wants your shitty cpu's.

re:anon

By lolller on 08.05.2008 - 17:05
anon your a idiot, amd whas always faster than intel. i remember i had the newest intel pentium 3 processor with 3.2 ghz in the past. i hated that one because i got frame drops badly, and my geforce whas good enough to run the games. but the intel processor whas to slow ( 3 years ago). fuck intel

fanboi idiots

By informed user on 11.05.2008 - 20:05
i think it funny, and somewhat anoying that people bash companies for their present faults and forget everything that happened just a few years ago, amd is havinng a very hard time in the quad core segment, but their dual cores are still the best for the money. intel was alwase slower then the competition with the pentiums(p3 vs ibm g4=g4, p4 vs amd athlon and ibm 970(g5)= amd and ibm)but now intel has come out with core 2 duo and intel have come out top in performance, but still charge too much. the market changes, we as consumers must too.


Add a Comment



Subject:
Your name (nick):
Text:
HTML, BBCode disabled in comments