Fixing Windows Vista: Taming UAC
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 1.5.2008
The User Account Control feature in Windows Vista has been known to drive normally level-headed people over the edge with frustration. If you find it annoying, you might be tempted to turn it off.
According to Microsoft research, somewhere between 12 and 16 percent of all Windows Vista users do exactly that. But before you take such a radical step, it helps to understand what UAC is actually doing on your behalf and how you can tone down its hard edges without sacrificing its protection.
The biggest misconception I hear about UAC is that it’s just another silly “Are you sure?” dialog box that users will quickly learn to ignore. That’s only one small part of the overall UAC system. The point of UAC is to allow you to run as a standard user, something that is nearly impossible in Windows XP and earlier Windows versions. In fact, with UAC enabled (the default setting) every user account in Windows Vista runs as a standard user. When you try to do something that requires administrative privileges, you see a UAC consent dialog box. If you’re an administrator, you simply have to click Continue when prompted. If you’re running as a standard user, you have to provide the user name and password of a member of the Administrators group.
UAC has four major benefits:
1. On a shared computer, you can set up standard user accounts for users who don’t have the experience or training to make smart decisions about installing software or making system changes. As a result, they won’t be able to do any damage if a malicious website fools them into trying to install a piece of spyware or a Trojan.
2. As an administrator, you get a warning before a piece of software attempts to make a change that can adversely affect the system. In Windows XP, clicking OK to a single malicious installer program could install a dozen programs in the background, with no warning to you. In Vista with UAC, you’ll have to give consent to each installation (and presumably will say No, early and often.)
3. Badly written programs sometimes try to write user data to system areas, such as the Windows or Program Files folder or a registry key that affects all users. In Windows XP, running this type of program as a standard user would probably cause the program to fail. With Vista, those operations are intercepted and written to a virtualized location in your user profile. The program thinks it wrote a file to the Windows folder, but the actual file appears in your profile.
4. Internet Explorer 7 runs in Protected Mode when UAC is on. That causes processes in a browser window to run at a low integrity level, where they’re blocked from interacting with processes that have a higher integrity level. The net effect is to stop entire classes of web-based attacks in their tracks.
Microsoft product unit manager David Cross made some remarks several weeks ago that have been widely misinterpreted. He was quoted as saying that the reason Microsoft added UAC to Windows Vista was “to annoy users.” The reality is that UAC shouldn’t be annoying, and consent dialog boxes shouldn’t be common. If you’re being pestered with UAC prompts all day long, you should be annoyed at the software developer that wrote the crappy program that’s responsible for those prompts, and you should in turn annoy them until they fix it.
source:
blogs.zdnet.com
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Fixing Windows Vista 3 - Top Troubleshooting Tools || Getting Rid of UAC in Vista.. || Disabling UAC Slows Vista's Bootup Time? || Microsoft Exec: UAC Designed To Annoy Users || Windows Vista SP1 vs. Windows Vista RTM vs. Windows XP SP2
Comments(9)
disable the worthless pos.
you just dont understand what it does...
the post above is incomplete, and i
know more better about what uac is doing. i have experimented what are the benefits and as
expected, there are.
those who disable uac are just noob and dont even bother
knowing what it really does.
in our language,
"masyado silang tamad at di
nila pinag-iisipan man lang kung ano ang ginagawa nun"
anyone who uses uac is a total n00b. uac is a joke. this is a tossed out feature that was
rejected by alpha/beta testers during win 2000 trial. i hated it then and it s.ucks worse
now.
for geeky power users like myself, a poorly implemented but well-intentioned feature is
as good as a redundant one. of course there are benefits to leaving it on, but would it
have hurt the development team that much to make use of some rudimentary artificial
intelligence technology to prevent uac from asking permission over and over for the same
application?
even in sp1, there's still too many prompts from uac. it really
makes clicking "continue" more of a waste of time than a precaution.
geeks = no uac (so turn it off and dont bother)
everyone else needs uac
just imagine a guy double clicking a trojan... uac have a 50% chance to prevent the
infection.
y - yes. i am. it is called vista. how to i get my money back. o' yeah, i can't. i have
to live with it. ms says so and i have to take it up the shite hole. just like my favorite
visit to the doctor. o' joy!
uac is good. if you dont like it disable it.
third party software is the problem, if you get uac pop ups from running normal software
then its the doftware at fault...
you simply are afraid of everything, like a kinda emo. please dont cry.
we all here
are experts on pc. i could guess you are not one so you turned on protection. you just
cant understand how fycking annoying it is to setup a program and the uac to prompt and
stop me. fyck it, i aint got time for this. i mean who is afraid of it?
you really
make me sick, grow up, or die, contribute to earth and kill yourself.
Add a Comment
Crap.
By sjc1963 on 02.05.2008 - 02:05