KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Why Windows 7 might go to pieces


section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 21.3.2008

There are a growing number of clues that Windows 7 — the next version of Windows about which Microsoft continues to remain mum — could be available in pieces.




By “pieces,” I mean a couple of different things:

1. Delivered in a role-based fashion, a la Windows Server.

Windows Server 2008 allows users to select which bits they want to install or ignore, based on a handful of predetermined “roles.” Windows Server Core is the minimum configuration. Given that Windows client and server are built from the same code base, doesn’t it make sense that the next version of client also will move to more of a roles-like system? Microsoft already allows OEMs to pick and choose among components using the OEM Preinstallation Kit (OPK). So why not allow customers to do the same?

A user-selectable, role-based Windows client could help Microsoft’s marketing folks from having to make the kinds of SKU choices that got Microsoft in legal hot water with Windows Vista. It wouldn’t be Microsoft deciding what constitutes “Windows-7-capable.” Instead, users would choose how much (or little) of Windows 7 they want on their systems.

2. Divided into complementary Software+Services elements.

Again, Microsoft has been foreshadowing, to an extent, what it is planning here. With Windows Vista, Microsoft showed that it could update components of Vista (example: the Windows Photo Gallery) via a Windows Live service (Windows Live Photo Gallery). One of my sources close to Microsoft recently told me that “major parts are being removed from Windows 7 (mail, photo, video)” but still will be available as user-selectable services. This plan, if it comes to pass, ought to help lessen the Windows attack surface that has been the target of various Microsoft competitors and antitrust regulators who’ve been critical of Microsoft bundling everything but the kitchen sink into Windows.

To be clear: Microsoft hasn’t confirmed any of these theories. And doubters may claim that the first, early test build of Windows 7 that made it into certain testers’ hands seemingly didn’t provide indications that turning Windows 7 into a bunch of disparate parts is Microsoft’s game plan.

(Too bad the Technical Committee affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice isn’t talking; the TC recently took delivery of an early Windows 7 build in order to give it a first sweep for potential areas of legal concern….)

source: blogs.zdnet.com

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Free Windows Vista and XP SP2 Downloads Updated and up for Grabs
next article >>
Microsoft To Release XP SP3 Next Week

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Vista SP1, and then Windows 7, Windows 8 and Non-Windows Midori || Windows Vista SP1 vs. Windows Vista RTM vs. Windows XP SP2 || Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP SP3: Official Release Dates || Download Free Windows Vista and Windows XP SP2 Straight from Microsoft || Windows Vista SP1 outperforms Windows XP SP2 in file copy

Comments(7)

windows 7

By kassy2188 on 22.03.2008 - 06:03
u guys seem really obsessed with windows 7

If Windows 7 is as good as it seems

By PCD on 22.03.2008 - 16:03
if windows 7 is as good as it seems then i might actually pay for it. but then again, windows vista sounded pretty good, too.

windows 7

By kassy_2188 on 22.03.2008 - 17:03
yeah windows vista isnt as bad as every one makes it seem, i think it a helluva lot more stable than xp, the only down fall for vista is that it is a resource hog and there is a hit on the performance when compared to xp

kassy_2188

By Codyp on 22.03.2008 - 19:03
i don't think the performance really lacks, i have dual boot on this computer, and i find myself using vista more because xp just feels to rough around the edges for me now. it is unstable and just feels weird to me now. but it definitly is faster, but thats because it was designed to run on machines that we're top of the line 8 years ago. and 1 year makes a big difference.

it is definitely a resource hog but if you have enough memory it runs perfectly fine and doesn't bother me at all. its a fair compromise to have a harder working computer for a more stable environment.
people will never see this because they are to busy putting it down, finding reasons to disown it. anything is horrible if you point out all its flaws.

Why Windows 7 might go to pieces

By nick on 22.03.2008 - 23:03
i'm going to buy a mac. thats it.

Windows xp 64 bit

By Pete on 23.03.2008 - 21:03
i,ve gotten the above and it is the best yet. very stable and fast. try it.

bleh!

By cm on 24.03.2008 - 11:03
if this is the future then it's a mac for me.


No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Forum