Vista SP1 up to 86% faster
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 5.3.2008
Is Vista SP1 really the shot in the arm your Vista system needs? We've spent many hours strapped to our benchmarking system in a caffeine and pizza fuelled haze to uncover these very interesting results.
We tested Vista:
* as it comes out of the box (RTM -- or "release to manufacturing")
* as it comes out of the box, with all Windows Update patches applied ("RTM patched)
* with the final SP1 service pack applied
Testing Setup
Although Vista SP1 has many documented improvements, we aimed to test a particular scenario which has proved to be a major problem for pre-SP1 users: file copy speed, particularly over a network.
Our scenario was a home user running Vista Home Premium on a fast, low-latency network with decent PC hardware. All file copy tests were initiated from the main machine.
Our test machines were:
* Main machine - an Acer Veriton 7900 Pro (Intel Core 2 Duo 6700/4GB RAM/ATI RADEON X1950/2xSATA-II HDD) running Windows Vista Home Premium
* A second machine running Windows Vista Home Premium (connected via gigabit Ethernet for file copy tests)
* A third machine running a fully-patched Windows XP SP2 installation (connected via a dedicated gigabit network to two remote systems).
Each system used the latest available vendor (non-Microsoft) drivers and the November release of DirectX. No modifications were made to the operating system, so as to represent as closely as possible the configuration of an OEM machine.
We uses two test file batches – the first was a single 2.5 GB ISO, and the second was 2.5GB of small files (over 300 MP3s). Each file batch was copied to a remote destination (write), and then written back across the wire to the test system (read/write).
The file copy destinations were:
* the second hard drive in the main testing system
* a SanDisk Cruzer Micro 8GB USB flash drive
* the remote Vista system
* the remote XP system.
File copies were timed from the time “Copy” was clicked to the time the copy shell disappeared.
We also ran PCMark Vantage across the test systems to get an overall impression of system performance.
The aim of the tests was to see how changes in the test machine’s patch level affected performance.
We therefore ran the tests three times – once with Vista Home Premium RTM, once with all the available patches applied from Windows Update, and once with SP1 RTM applied.
The secondary Vista system was also patched to maintain consistency between it and the test machine.
The XP system was unchanged throughout the tests, running fully patched XP SP2.
Hard drives on all the three systems were defragmented before each file copy test.
source:
apcmag.com
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
64-bit Vista SP1 Runs Faster than 32-bit Vista SP1 and 32-bit XP SP3! || Windows Server 2008 is 20% faster than Vista || Windows Server 2008 Is 45 Times Faster Than Windows Server 2003 || 32-bit Vista SP1 = 1GB – 64-bit Vista SP1 = 1.5GB || What Microsoft doesn't want you to know about Vista SP1
Comments(10)
i had my computer with vista non-sp1 installed with high performance turned on and after
installing sp1 my system started acting weird. slower browsing, longing load times.
indexing on/off didn't matter. took a long time to search for files. took a long time to
restart and my system became slower with sp1 than without.
well duh. the only thing vista sp1 fixed was file copying. how does it stack up with
everything else? i know... the same as pre-sp1 which is 3x slower than xp.
fix
one problem and cause four more, that's the ms way.
drivers is only the big issue right now
i am getting tired of everyone bitching about how slow vista is. vista is like windows
me. we all know it's slow. just go back to xp pro & everything will be fine.
why is there no vista sp1 rtm download posted here despite the fact that m$ finished it
in february ?!? there's no f***ing way we can verify that sp1 is any faster !
check out the forum or try google it is your freind..
for those of you who installed sp1 and think speeds have decreased, such as longer loads
its because vista's superfetch has been cleared after sp1 install.. give it a couple days
and everything will be smoooth
hi!
please can someone help me out?
where can i download windows
vista sp1. just simple sp1. i will be very thankful if you help me.
thanks
i have benchmarked xp sp3 and vista sp1 with 3dmark06 and from a gamers perspective on my
system instaed of getting just under 11000 i get just over 10000.. think it was 10243
that performance difference isnt really that much for having an os that looks 10
times better than xp
not my xp! i use 'stardock' and have access to like two thousand different xp themes,
even a clone of vista right down to the mouse pointers! vista can't even come close! xp
has speed, compatibility, driver support. vista will be declared the new me 2 one day soon
and replaced in 2009 with windows 7. why do you think they've ramped up production? think
about it my little microsoft sheeples!
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
novaspeed
By sunlita-hole on 06.03.2008 - 03:03