KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Vista SP1 up to 86% faster


section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 5.3.2008

Is Vista SP1 really the shot in the arm your Vista system needs? We've spent many hours strapped to our benchmarking system in a caffeine and pizza fuelled haze to uncover these very interesting results.




We tested Vista:

* as it comes out of the box (RTM -- or "release to manufacturing")
* as it comes out of the box, with all Windows Update patches applied ("RTM patched)
* with the final SP1 service pack applied

Testing Setup

Although Vista SP1 has many documented improvements, we aimed to test a particular scenario which has proved to be a major problem for pre-SP1 users: file copy speed, particularly over a network.

Our scenario was a home user running Vista Home Premium on a fast, low-latency network with decent PC hardware. All file copy tests were initiated from the main machine.

Our test machines were:

* Main machine - an Acer Veriton 7900 Pro (Intel Core 2 Duo 6700/4GB RAM/ATI RADEON X1950/2xSATA-II HDD) running Windows Vista Home Premium
* A second machine running Windows Vista Home Premium (connected via gigabit Ethernet for file copy tests)
* A third machine running a fully-patched Windows XP SP2 installation (connected via a dedicated gigabit network to two remote systems).

Each system used the latest available vendor (non-Microsoft) drivers and the November release of DirectX. No modifications were made to the operating system, so as to represent as closely as possible the configuration of an OEM machine.

We uses two test file batches – the first was a single 2.5 GB ISO, and the second was 2.5GB of small files (over 300 MP3s). Each file batch was copied to a remote destination (write), and then written back across the wire to the test system (read/write).

The file copy destinations were:

* the second hard drive in the main testing system
* a SanDisk Cruzer Micro 8GB USB flash drive
* the remote Vista system
* the remote XP system.

File copies were timed from the time “Copy” was clicked to the time the copy shell disappeared.

We also ran PCMark Vantage across the test systems to get an overall impression of system performance.

The aim of the tests was to see how changes in the test machine’s patch level affected performance.

We therefore ran the tests three times – once with Vista Home Premium RTM, once with all the available patches applied from Windows Update, and once with SP1 RTM applied.

The secondary Vista system was also patched to maintain consistency between it and the test machine.

The XP system was unchanged throughout the tests, running fully patched XP SP2.

Hard drives on all the three systems were defragmented before each file copy test.

source: apcmag.com

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
New Home for Windows Ultimate Exclusives from Microsoft
next article >>
Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 Download

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
64-bit Vista SP1 Runs Faster than 32-bit Vista SP1 and 32-bit XP SP3! || Windows Server 2008 is 20% faster than Vista || Windows Server 2008 Is 45 Times Faster Than Windows Server 2003 || 32-bit Vista SP1 = 1GB – 64-bit Vista SP1 = 1.5GB || What Microsoft doesn't want you to know about Vista SP1

Comments(10)

novaspeed

By sunlita-hole on 06.03.2008 - 03:03
i had my computer with vista non-sp1 installed with high performance turned on and after installing sp1 my system started acting weird. slower browsing, longing load times. indexing on/off didn't matter. took a long time to search for files. took a long time to restart and my system became slower with sp1 than without.

What else is new?

By Al on 06.03.2008 - 03:03
well duh. the only thing vista sp1 fixed was file copying. how does it stack up with everything else? i know... the same as pre-sp1 which is 3x slower than xp.

fix one problem and cause four more, that's the ms way.

I AGREED 101%. NOT JUST COPY BUT MANY OTHERS

By Mao on 06.03.2008 - 03:03
drivers is only the big issue right now

Dunbass

By PackedFunk on 06.03.2008 - 03:03
i am getting tired of everyone bitching about how slow vista is. vista is like windows me. we all know it's slow. just go back to xp pro & everything will be fine.

Who the F*** cares? There's no VISTA SP1 RTM download yet !!!

By doop on 06.03.2008 - 03:03
why is there no vista sp1 rtm download posted here despite the fact that m$ finished it in february ?!? there's no f***ing way we can verify that sp1 is any faster !

doop

By LMAO on 06.03.2008 - 04:03
check out the forum or try google it is your freind..

SuperFetch

By turbo264 on 06.03.2008 - 08:03
for those of you who installed sp1 and think speeds have decreased, such as longer loads its because vista's superfetch has been cleared after sp1 install.. give it a couple days and everything will be smoooth

Where can i download Vista SP1

By Thorn on 06.03.2008 - 17:03
hi!

please can someone help me out?

where can i download windows vista sp1. just simple sp1. i will be very thankful if you help me.

thanks

Vista performance

By newt on 06.03.2008 - 18:03
i have benchmarked xp sp3 and vista sp1 with 3dmark06 and from a gamers perspective on my system instaed of getting just under 11000 i get just over 10000.. think it was 10243

that performance difference isnt really that much for having an os that looks 10 times better than xp

Vista's poor programming

By Gamer on 07.03.2008 - 15:03
not my xp! i use 'stardock' and have access to like two thousand different xp themes, even a clone of vista right down to the mouse pointers! vista can't even come close! xp has speed, compatibility, driver support. vista will be declared the new me 2 one day soon and replaced in 2009 with windows 7. why do you think they've ramped up production? think about it my little microsoft sheeples!


No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Forum