KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Microsoft execs saw problems with early Vista


section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 28.2.2008

Even some of Microsoft Corp.'s top officials struggled to make Windows Vista work smoothly when it was released, according to internal e-mails released Wednesday.




The messages, unsealed in a lawsuit against the company, show that Vista's early problems with hardware and software compatibility affected more than just average PC users. The e-mails also illustrate how the company will try to avoid such issues in the next Windows release.

"We need to be clearer with industry, and we need to decide what we will do and do that well and 100 percent and not just do a little of everything," wrote Steven Sinofsky, the Microsoft executive who took over Windows engineering after Vista's retail release in January 2007.

The scattershot approach left hardware makers "in a confused state," Sinofsky added in the February 2007 e-mail, not long after he assumed the post. The message is notable in part because Sinofsky has been publicly quiet about Microsoft's plans for the next version, known by the internal code name Windows 7.

Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer endorsed Sinofsky's sentiment succinctly. "Righto," Ballmer replied.

Those and other messages were made public as part of a lawsuit alleging that Microsoft deceived consumers before Windows Vista's launch by touting PCs as "Windows Vista Capable" even if they could run only Windows Vista Home Basic. That bare-bones version lacks many of Windows Vista's signature features, such as slick graphics.

The lawsuit was granted class-action status last week. The e-mails unsealed Wednesday, previously disclosed only in snippets, focus in part on an internal debate over the standards for the "Windows Vista Capable" designation. But they also expose a broader discussion about the operating system's compatibility problems.

Microsoft spokesman Jack Evans said in a statement Wednesday: "Throughout this process, Microsoft employees raised concerns and addressed issues with the intent to make this program better for our business partners and valuable for consumers. That's the sort of exchange we want to encourage. And in the end, we believe we succeeded in achieving both objectives."

One February 2007 exchange started with an e-mail to Ballmer from Microsoft board member Jon Shirley, who explained that he upgraded one of his computers to Vista only to find it was experiencing problems working with two of Microsoft's own MSN applications. Shirley wrote that he wasn't upgrading his other computer because of a lack of hardware drivers.

source: seattlepi.nwsource.com

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Windows XP SP3 RC2 Refreshed and Re-Released!
next article >>
Internet Explorer 8 Beta 1 Is Close – Microsoft Says Get Ready

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Early Vista SP1 64-bit installs causing new problems? || Microsoft glitch offers up Vista SP1 early || Windows Vista Activation Problems || Vista SP1 Has Driver Compatibility Problems? Do Tell! || Microsoft: Windows XP SP3 Available EARLY! in 2008

Comments(6)

Vista's poor programming

By Gamer on 29.02.2008 - 02:02
vista has been a train wreak since day one! i swear its a joke. 6 different versions is messed up. 1 or 2 should've been enough.

TOTALY AGREE

By rucamx on 29.02.2008 - 02:02
i totaly agree,with gamer,why six+one versions,the "one"is my lite version,lol.
if it weren't for the resource hog,vista would probably turn out alright,i mean if vista had gone out 6 months from now,it would probably be a good os...but nooooo,those microshit corp bastards had to make money,hey,how does it feel now,to be the laughing stock of the entire software industry you morons!

peace out

Still rich...

By sjc1963 on 29.02.2008 - 03:02
maybe, but they're still very rich......

Vista

By YObro on 29.02.2008 - 08:02
i like vista, it makes me orgasm. mac makes me sober

vista

By hackspiderx on 29.02.2008 - 17:02
if m$ put a little more time and money into vista it would of turned out better. their biggest problem is that they built an entirely differnt kernel from the kernel in xp. the compatibility between xp's and vista's applications is horrible. as well as kernel consumes to many resources for current machines. actually the kernel isn't bad in structure, its that it wasn't ready to be released (the consumer market computers are not fast enough and there's not enough vista built applications.)

Linux

By Trojan on 29.02.2008 - 17:02
i think ms should believe that people are not dumb to buy what they sell. must have thaught of providing better services rather than using the old tricks. everyone knows that vista is hungry for resources.

if they are to keep vista alive, there must be a dramatic change in performance. most of the programs have some issues with vista. not to mention its own explorer has many problem. never stable.

i thaught that ms would make vista less hungry but its hungry for even more and more. i believe vista will never be satified.

now the time as come for the world to move to linux or vixta


No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Forum