Could Windows 7 be the best Windows yet?
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 22.1.2008
Given all the feedback that Microsoft has had from Vista users (both negative and positive), could Windows 7 be the best version of Windows yet?
Vista is turning out to be a bit of an enigma. While sales seem strong, users seem far from satisfied with the latest offering from Redmond. Also, while consumers and businesses alike have been eagerly waiting for SP1, it now seems that this won’t be enough to quell the constant flow of negativity. If it is true that Microsoft is pulling out the stops to get Windows 7 out of the door and onto PCs are fast as possible, this does seem to suggest that Microsoft is taking this negative feedback seriously and wants to put the Vista mistakes behind it.
If Microsoft has been listening to the feedback, the company will have a pretty good idea of what people thought was wrong with Vista, and this could give the project managers and developers a pretty blueprint for what the next version should be like.
So, if Microsoft has been listening to the feedback, what will Windows 7 be like? Well, first off, Microsoft needs to trim the bloat out of the OS. While Vista can certainly be fast when you throw enough hardware at it, at the lower end of the hardware spectrum it’s hard not to start to see problems, and has the focus moves onto cheaper PCs, Microsoft needs to have a flexible platform that can accommodate a broad spectrum for PCs, from high-performance systems to cheap $200-$250 systems.
Secondly, Windows 7 needs to figure out the best way to leverage UAC or totally get rid of it. If you’re technically minded UAC shouldn’t be a problem, but if you’re not then that changes and you end up with an operating system that refuses to work the way you want it to.
Another stumbling block that Vista encountered was hardware and software compatibility. These issues have to be kept to a minimum in the next version if the new OS isn’t to attract the same level of criticism. Vendors have to be encouraged to develop drivers rather than expect home and business users to landfill things because of the lack of drivers.Then we come onto performance. Think about performance and you realize that the main competition that Vista has doesn’t come from Mac OS X or Linux, but from Windows XP. Benchmark after benchmark shows that XP is capable of beating Vista hands down. Vista SP1 does little to address these issues while XP SP3 makes the old OS perform even better.
Another valid criticism of Vista is that of the UI. While the interface undoubtedly looks sexier, that pretty interface doesn’t translate into an interface that’s better or easier to use. In fact, many claim that the new interface is nowhere near as clear or as easy to use as that of XP. Just redesigning something to look different doesn’t automatically mean that it’s better.
And then there are the drivers. Microsoft is collecting more and more information about system crashes than ever but we’re still seeing drivers causing problems that they were causing a year ago. Either Microsoft isn’t using this information effectively or the information isn’t trickling down the chain fast enough to the vendors. Good drivers are key to a solid, robust and fast OS and so far the drivers that I’m coming across for Vista just aren’t up to scratch.
source:
blogs.zdnet.com
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Windows Vista SP1 vs. Windows Vista RTM vs. Windows XP SP2 || Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP SP3: Official Release Dates || Download Free Windows Vista and Windows XP SP2 Straight from Microsoft || Windows Vista SP1 outperforms Windows XP SP2 in file copy || Windows XP Home No Longer Qualifies for Windows Vista Upgrades
Comments(10)
m$ would have to be truly incompetent to make something worse than vista and totally out
of touch with reality.....
the next windows should be based on linux, then it will truly be secure and stable.....
where can i get a copy to try?
at least in the short term, the more resources microsoft devotes to windows 7, the fewer
will be left over to maintain the ancient xp. yet another way for them to nudge windows
users to take the vista plunge.
if linux was as popular as windows, linux would be as unsecured as windows. ask apple,
the more popular leopard becomes, the more secure it ain't! but for some reason some
linux retard has to open his yap every time a windows vulnerability appears...the penalty
for hacking or virus writing should be death by hanging...then all our problems would be
solved.
folks get off this bandwagon, every time a whisper of another os from microsoft bragging
about the next best thing and you all stick your head up their butts. give me a break.
it only means that microsoft failed to satisfy its customers with windows vista, thus,
releasing another product which is very peculiar in terms of performance.
i suggest
that the greatest challenge for microsoft is to create an os minimalistic to the
specification of a computer but still, delivering stunning effects. vista, having a lot of
burden particularly in its requirements, made more customers to think twice before they
buy...
all this bickering over oses, everyone trying to outdo the other with their gripes. i
think the old adage comes to mind.
you can please some of the people some of
the time, but you will never please all of the people all of the time.
if you
can do better, get off your asses and do it, put up or shut up.
i'll stick with xp for now, it works...end of story.
nothing is secured in this world. period
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
Incompetence...
By sjc1963 on 23.01.2008 - 02:01