Windows XP Closes In on SP3
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 4.12.2007
Microsoft's most successful operating system, ever, has inched closer to Service Pack 3. Release Candidate 1 is now available from MSDN and—so I hear—from TechNet. I can only personally confirm MSDN availability.
It's something of a tongue twister: Windows XP Service Pack 3 Release Candidate 1. Surely the name breaks some grammatical rule about number agreement.
The update is mixed benefit for Microsoft. What the company should want is more Windows Vista migrations. Windows XP SP3 is expected to release about the same time as Windows Vista Service Pack 1. But the installed base is overwhelmingly Windows XP. It's not like an XP update is going to encourage IT organizations to migrate to Vista. Why switch when XP runs just fine and presumably better with SP3?
One wonders what the fly on the wall heard during the Microsoft service pack debate. Surely there was one. It's easy to imagine some Microsoft product managers arguing for a long SP3 delay in favor of pushing Vista adoption, while others insisting on doing the right thing by XP customers. For a while there, given Microsoft's surprising reticence about either service pack, XP users were looking to be people left behind by the Vista bus. Vista likely will still get the preferential treatment, but XP users won't wait for a bus that may never come.
XP SP3 RC1's milestone foreshadows Vista SP1 development. Microsoft isn't about to open the SP3 testing floodgates while sending SP1 to trickle, trickle down a faucet. XP SP3's broader beta demands similar treatment for Vista SP1. I've heard from some Microsoft elves that, barring any North Pole catastrophes, Vista SP1 RC1 will be more broadly available long before Christmas. Ho, ho, ho. Have I mixed enough metaphors yet?
Microsoft's development of Vista SP1, XP SP3 and Windows Server 2008 is taking place nearly in lockstep. It's raining release candidates! Windows Server is the core code base, and, at least since 2004, desktop and server OS development are closely timed, with Windows Server's timetable setting the agenda for Windows client.
So, Windows Server 2008's next major testing milestones should precede additional Vista SP1 RCs, which would come before new XP SP3 RCs. The three products should also release to manufacturing in fairly close proximity of time. Dec. 10 or 11 would be good dates for that broader Vista SP1 test build. I'm traveling those days, which is reason enough for the big SP1 RC1 to come when I'm on a plane somewhere. Don't you just hate when that happens?
source:
microsoft-watch.com
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
It's Time to Face the Ugly Truth, SP3 or No SP3, the Clock Is Ticking for Windows XP || Vista Closes in on 150 Million Sold Licenses || XP SP3 Does Not Support Windows XP || Vista SP1 RC Leaves XP SP2 in the Dust, but What About XP SP3? || Microsoft Makes Its Own Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2, Leaves XP SP3 Out
Comments(11)
why xp-sp3 when there's vista!
(signed by a linux and mac hater)
cause xp is better than crap vista
the rc of xp sp3 has been available on microsoft connect for weeks (11/15/07)
so, wow, its on msdn and technet... too bad its the exact same build.
i agree that vista is like me but like me if you tweak it and set it up just right you
have a really great system.
does any one have xp sp3 links
vista tweaking, yeah with 4 gb ram with a quad core processor, only ultimate runs ok. but
if tweaked (i am a msdn tester!!), it still runs slow according to xp, and try hacking a
vista system, 5 mins and you're done. sp 1 should solve that issue as well, but it stil
is still good too hack...escpecially network connections.....nice. well i have a dual boot
for testing, xp and ultimate, vista ultimate is for the users with money, and who like a
lot of add ons wich you don't use....xp is better faster more reliable and less blue
screens.
the redold
here ya go
http://www.andysfederation.com/windowsxp-kb936929-sp3-x86-enu.exe
i m using vista ultimate since beta1, i do't remember if i saw bsod in rtm. x64 is much
better if u got 2gb ram, use vistamanager to tweek, search google u will see lots of
registry hacks. best way is to use vlite & make a stripped version accourding to ur needs,
that works for me
i hope sp1 will improve vista performace, i hav dual boot with xp
x86, use xp for gamming only.
now prob. is that xp x64 s*cks and i got dual xeon with
4gb ram
so better choice is vista x64 [but only for power users]
dude,call faa to ground planes,due to a bomb threat,then u can test your sp's!
mwahahaha.
it's based on 2003 core and i don't think it s*cks at all! however, i used to use vista
x64 and thank you so much...take it for yourself...
well if sp3 is supposed to fck up xp so vista looks good they succeded. i tried it and
it was horrible. i know it's a rc1 but it felt more like a alfa -1.
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
XP-SP3?
By qwztnzz on 04.12.2007 - 21:12