KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Microsoft: Windows XP Failures Are by Design


section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 12.11.2007

Nothing but bad design is responsible for Windows XP failures. The consistent volume of logon failure events in Windows XP, when the operating system is not part of a domain, is generated by the design of the overall log in process.




Eric Fitzgerald, Program Manager, Windows Auditing and Intrusion Detection Microsoft, revealed that the shell teams had to make up during the development process for the lack of a application programming interface designed to indicate accounts that had blank passwords.

"When in a workgroup (not domain joined), Windows XP displays a welcome screen that has little pictures (called "tiles") for each user who is permitted to log on to the computer. The shell team wanted the experience that when you click on a tile, that you will immediately be logged on if your password is blank (we have good data that a large percentage of home users have blank passwords). They only want you to be prompted for a password if you actually have a password. Fair enough, and it also helps with accessibility for people for whom typing is challenging", Fitzgerald explained.

Simply put – during the start-up process, Windows XP has to make up for the missing API via a trial and error action, namely the XP Welcome Screen will use a blank password in order to log in each user. Accounts with passwords will generate failures immediately, while accounts without passwords will produce log in success just to also fail the logon. This issue has gone unfixed in SP1 and SP2. In Windows Vista the Welcome Screen was redesigned in order to scrap the problem.

"The Welcome Screen uses the result of these logon attempts to decide whether to display a password box when you select a user's tile. If the user has a blank password, they will be logged on instead of being prompted for a password. Why are they logging on the account? Well it turns out to be the easiest way to tell if your password is blank. We don't have a "is your password blank" API- that would be a security disaster - and we would prefer that the shell team not go mucking about in the SAM, retrieving hashes and computing the blank password hash for each account so that it could compare them", Fitzgerald added.

source: news.softpedia.com

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Forget about Vista – Onward to Future Versions of Windows...
next article >>
Download Windows Vista SP1 Beta RC Build 6001.17036 v.652 via WebUpdater

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Five-Year-Old Windows Design Flaw Comes Back to Haunt Vista || Microsoft Makes Its Own Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2, Leaves XP SP3 Out || XP SP3 Does Not Support Windows XP || Download Free Windows Vista and Windows XP SP2 Straight from Microsoft || Microsoft Presents the Lost Comparison: Windows Vista vs. Windows XP

Comments(6)

old_news

By psbist on 13.11.2007 - 00:11
^w^t^f??????
^this was already posted on other major ^windows news sites over two years ago. ^w^t^f are you posting so much "old news" here on ^kez? ^you still have many headlines to post even without this and other old news.

Vista Probmatic

By PackedFunk on 13.11.2007 - 04:11
pointing out xp flaws does not in any way make vista better. fix vista & don't worry about xp.

Failures are "By Design"?

By Nick on 13.11.2007 - 05:11
this is the scariest statement yet by a m$ flack-- not exactly confidence-inspiring-- who writes this stuff, george w. bush?

Microsoft will say anything to get Vista sales up!!!

By Sofia on 13.11.2007 - 12:11
oh boy, they must be desperate...

Still Better

By sjc1963 on 13.11.2007 - 22:11
even with its "flaws" xp is still better than vista where it counts. a pretty face is not that important in this regard. vista is a dumb blonde of an os.

who cares

By hapbvt on 14.11.2007 - 23:11
how is this a bug, or a security issue or anything other than trivia?
yay lets upgrade to vista so we have less ignorable errors in our event logs?
the average windows xp / vista / 2003 / whatever machine that's been running for a few months probably has hundreds of irrelevant errors in the event log, is that really a problem or just normal?



No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Forum