KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Windows XP Service Pack 3 - Will it turn XP into Vista?


section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 19.10.2007

Microsoft is currently cooking the third and last service pack for Windows XP. Released back at the end of 2001, and overhauled in 2004 with the introduction of Service Pack 2, the next refresh for XP is long overdue.




Microsoft's own game with Service Pack 3, involving numerous and repeated delays, helped not only XP SP2 to dig in its roots deep enough to provide a consistent inhouse competition to Windows Vista, but also managed to starve XP users, already terribly hungry for a major update to their operating system.

In mid July, concomitantly with the pre-beta release of Vista SP1, Microsoft also delivered a limited preview of XP SP3, confirming that the service pack was right on track for general availability in the first half of 2008. With Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008, formerly codenamed Longhorn, pushed to the foreground, the next development milestone for XP SP3 shipped after the first beta for Vista SP1 and the Release Candidate 0 of Microsoft's last 32-bit server operating system. The late availability date for XP SP3, in comparison with the synchronized releases for Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008 is a clear indication that the operating system is being strategically kept in the background.

But while this is indeed valid for the company, Windows XP users and Microsoft partners play to a different tune. According to data from Net Applications, Windows XP still accounts for 79.32% of the operating system market. This while Windows Vista's share has grown from near to nothing at launch to over 7.3%, an indication that Microsoft has passed the 70 million shipped licenses in the operating system's first eight months on the market. And if Vista keeps its current adoption pace, it is unlikely that Microsoft will reach the 100 million sold copies mark, roughly equivalent to 10% of the operating system market by the end of 2007, even taking into consideration the holiday shopping spree.

In this context, Windows XP will continue to account for the lion's share of the estimated 1 billion install base of the Windows platform, in the first half of 2008, despite the release of Vista SP1. Undoubtedly, some XP users will ignore Vista SP1, wait for XP SP3, and ride the aging operating system launched in 2001, until 2010 when Windows 7, Vista's successor is planned for launch. Microsoft's perspective in this case is that such a move is nothing more than ignoring the inevitable, and the inevitable is of course synonymous with Windows Vista, for the company.

At this point in time, Microsoft will retire mainstream support for Windows XP in 2009, and extended support in 2014. But after caving in to the sheer pressure from end users and original equipment manufacturers, the company will continue to sell XP via the retail and OEM channels throughout mid 2008, and via system builders until the end of January 2009. This, along with XP SP3 is bound to deliver quite an impact onto the operating system market, that XP is already hugging to the point of asphyxiation, leaving Vista with little room to breathe, SP1 or no SP1.

Installing SP3 on top of XP SP2 won't make the operating system a Vista equivalent. Sure enough, Microsoft has backported some Vista specific features, functionality and capabilities to XP via SP3, and more could be in the works, although the company did not confirm such a scenario. Still, the Vista additions to XP SP3 involve revamped descriptive options to the graphical interface of the Security Center. On top of this, XP SP3 will also support FIPS 140-1 Level 1 cryptography implemented as a DLL at kernel level, opening up new algorithms to developers via the Kernel Mode Cryptographic Module. The black hole router detection system will be evolved along with the integration of Vista's Network Access Protection module.

SP3 will also feature a range of items previously available as standalone downloads including: Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) 2.5; IPsec Simple Policy Update; Microsoft Core XML Services 6.0; Microsoft Management Console (MMC) 3.0; Digital Identity Management Service (DIMS); Peer Name Resolution Protocol 2.1; Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) 2 and Windows Installer 3.1 v2. So it is obvious that SP3 won't turn the operating system into Vista, but as far as end users are concerned, this is nothing short of a positive aspect.

Microsoft has now opened Windows XP SP3 Beta Preview Build 3205 to over 12,000 Windows Vista SP1 beta and Windows Server 2008 testers. The build has also been leaked to peer-to-peer file sharing networks, and Microsoft is preparing a public beta of the service pack.

source: news.softpedia.com

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Eric Traut talks (and demos) Windows 7 and MinWin
next article >>
VirtualBox 1.5.2

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Windows XP Service Pack 3 FINAL || Inside Windows XP Service Pack 3w || Complete Overview of Windows XP Service Pack 3 || Windows XP Service Pack 3 (SP3) FAQ || Windows XP Service Pack 3 Released to Manufacturing

Comments(17)

Jenny

By Hummm.... on 19.10.2007 - 22:10
i hope not!

yeah, vista is really bad

By dc on 20.10.2007 - 00:10
i'm glad that xp is making such a strong stand as it should do, vista is not just bloat, it's extreme bloat and have xp turn into something like that, i would have to move to linux or mac and i'm not alone either, none of my tech savvy friends like it either, i just can't do with microsoft's dumb stunts anymore.

KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID!

By rucamx PT on 20.10.2007 - 01:10
the best xp is a simple xp!
not a stupid all rigged with security(that half the people don't use)shit!


Don't worry, it won't...but...........

By Desert Rat on 20.10.2007 - 08:10
i installed vista to play around with it, just as many people here have. ultimate is, as dc said, bloated as slow.

since i use my pc mainly for business, i used vlite to build a vista business pc - scrapped all but necessary items - and turned off the most stupid feature of all - uac. installed and further disabled all unneeded services. ultimate booted from the bootmenu to the password prompt in about 45 - 70 seconds. with no startup items, the desktop took another 30-40 seconds.

with business model i built, boot-up is 21 seconds and that's with office 2007, acrobat, quick books and nod32 and sw doctor installed. the desktop appears in 2-3 seconds and is usable in about 10 seconds. applying the performance and reliability really helped.

an additional trick is to set non-essential services that must be started to automatic-delayed so you can use your pc sooner.

xp is still my main squeeze and vista is starting to get somewhat usable. i still just play with it. the big problem here is that most people and all businesses do not want to go through the crap i just described. they install vista with defaults and the defaults is what makes it so fricking unusable.

all this was done using an amd opteron 175 and 2gb ram. heh, my performance is index is a whopping 2.7 since my video card is geforce 6600 with 256mb. i'm using aero and it runs somewhat well.

still, i won't trust it until at least sp1, which is actually what most "in the know" folks i've talked to have said all along.

Wow...

By Phiber0pt on 20.10.2007 - 14:10
your hard drives must be going or something... desert rat... because it shouldn't take 45-70 seconds to boot to the password prompt, even under half those specs.. i think i get to the password prompt in... 7-13 seconds... and about 3-5 seconds for the desktop...



say what?

By david on 20.10.2007 - 14:10
even people with top spec computers would find it hard to get 7-13 seconds even on windows xp, i don't know what planet your on but this is earth.

aero for xp

By kas on 20.10.2007 - 17:10
making aero for xp would be really cool, but they can't, vista won't sell if they do this...

GET a life.....get a Mac!

By That Ballmer S-hole on 21.10.2007 - 07:10
apple dot com !

Oh god, I hope Not!!!

By Eleanor on 21.10.2007 - 11:10
i'm on vista right now as it just came with my laptop! but i've had more than enouh of it, and going back o xp.
i mean, what's good about fency graphics when i can properly run the applications that get my job done?

Oh god, I hope Not!!!

By Eleanor-Correction on 21.10.2007 - 11:10
i mean, what's good about fency graphics when i can't properly run the applications that get my job done?


They're all GOOD STUFFS. DON'T LIE!

By ChineseMan on 21.10.2007 - 21:10
thanks bills

Too Little Too Late!

By MrMister on 22.10.2007 - 13:10
if they would have had vista ready by 2005 perhaps they would have a chance to overshadow xp. too bad that m$ messed up and couldn't deliver. vista is the "windows me" of operating systems. more like an interim until windows 7 in 2010. newbs will buy comps with vista pre-installed and be crying and complaining like all those winme people. meanwhile, winxp folks are like the windows 2000 users of yore who can ride it out, until a decent operating system becomes available. i'll be using windows xp professional sp3 and wait it out. i'll definitely need a new computer by the time "windows 7" comes out but that's okay. i'd need a new computer to run vista anyway. as i see it, i cannot foresee a *need* to upgrade to vista when my current hardware runs so great on winxp and will continue to do so.

lmers on march

By Dorkus on 24.10.2007 - 02:10
you stupid lamerz there isnt going to be any new big got to have improvements...

your talking about the biggest greedyest corp on the planet thay first dont care and secound wouldnt care if you were personaly ivolved...

if you want to play your games in xp then join falling leaf other wize just shut the lamer stuff up...



omg i want to kill you all

By Bob on 26.10.2007 - 00:10
ok... what kind of pc does everyone else in the world have... im sorry, but everyone whinges about vista, ive had it for a month or 2 and it loads altogether in around 20-25seconds, which im happy with. i understand xp would be faster and all, but vista is so much more efficient, at least for me it is, i also find all the quirky little touches in vista so much nicer to use, if i click something im rewarded with a lovely little animation, or pleasant little sound. i know this doesnt appeal to alot of people, and i have made no sense whatsoever, but i just had to say that =d

bob's post

By nick on 26.10.2007 - 05:10
can you say "system resources"?

Belive me i know

By TheLoneWolf on 29.10.2007 - 07:10
well i will go all out and say that vista is a resource hog. i say this from a gamer stand point. most xp games for example need lets say 256 ram, while vista(for the same game)needs 512. if they keep this up i will be out dated using vista. also another anger issue is that most new games and those going crossplatform (pc-xbox360) need to be running windows vista. siiiiigh. so i bit the bullit and meet them half way. still using my tried tested and true xp, but using ms open sorce vpc2007, i use xp for every thing stable now. and for those games were i need to run vista, just click on vpc2007,run vista, takes about a minute give or take. and with a press of the alt key i can jump to vista for those new games and features and alt back out when i am done. completely seamless. now i know that vista has it's probs but, that method has caused me no heartache at all.

have your cake and eat it to!

andry words cloud the issue, facts and clairity is the way to get your message across. rid the worls of dumb and angry post

Speedy XP with VISTA Look & Feels

By VistaMizer User on 10.11.2007 - 12:11
right now, i have the vista look & feel on my windows xp using the vistamizer 2.0.0 software. best of all, i still have my my speedy fast system with zero vista bloated craps and zero vista problems.



No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Forum