• Vista Wallpapers
• Windows Wallpapers

As my blogging colleague Dana Blankenhorn notes, the SCO ruling seemingly has no impact on Microsoft’s allegations of patent violations by the Linux and open-source communities.

But industry historians may recall that Microsoft wasn’t totally removed from the whole SCO-Unix-copyright matter.

Microsoft played matchmaker back in 2003 when SCO needed money to help fund its lawsuits agains IBM and various other Linux players and customers. Microsoft suggested that hedge fund BayStar Capital invest $50 million in SCO.

Microsoft also backed SCO’s play to convince other vendors and customers to license SCO’s technology to avoid potential infringement lawsuits. (Maybe that’s where Microsoft got its patent-licensing ideas ….)

One of the first companies to snap up two SCO licenses was Microsoft, to the tune of $12 million, according to BusinessWeek. Sun Microsystems and Computer Associates also bought into SCO’s plan.

I wonder if Microsoft will attempt to recoup its $12 million, now that SCO’s Unix licensing strategy has been exposed as a sham? I asked the Softies for any statements they might want to make, re: the SCO matter. So far, no word back.