KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Windows 7 RTM 7600.16385.090713-1255 HERE !

How to activate Windows 7 RC build 7600, 7264, 7231 and olders


Bad news about about SP1 for Vista

section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 6.6.2007

    Tip: Click here to update all your PC's outdated drivers

zero061099 report in our forum that: "went to the AMD Microsoft tech tour and learned some nice stuff. With SP1 the activation process will change big time...




WGA will scan the computer for any boot manager that fakes the boot up. ie-vloader."

My thought and let me know if Im wrong but I beleive that if a user wad to hide the bootprog files and/or lock them that the user should be ok...anyone have a better idea??

Follow link to forum for the discuss.

View: KezNews Discussion - Bad news about about SP1 for Vista

  >> Click Here to Run a Free Scan for PC Errors <<

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
The W0W Vista Cracks AIO V2
next article >>
Vista License and Product Key Terminology Part 2

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
How to Upgrade Vista SP1 to Windows 7 || Windows Dynamic Cache Service for Vista SP1 || Expression Blend 3 Preview for Vista SP1 and XP SP3 || Expiration dates for Vista SP1 and XP SP3 blocks announced || Vista SP1 with Antivirus Installed on Multiple CPU Systems Eats All Resources

Comments(23)

hummm

By Bill Gates on 07.06.2007 - 00:06
that will not be a problem to tha hackers...they will find a way :)

They gotta be very careful

By samic on 07.06.2007 - 01:06
one misstep and they'll mess up legitimate linux's bootloader... that would be *very* ugly.

Why not already?

By sjc1963 on 07.06.2007 - 01:06
if they could that then why haven't they done it already?

like xp the hackers will just put out a patched version of wga.

Linux Bootloader!

By Some Dude on 07.06.2007 - 01:06
so much for my dualboot legit fedora/vista system. i cant imagine that ms will miss that.

its like i always say.

"as long as there is some there to say it cant be done, there will be someone there to prove it wrong."

somedude

WAIT.....IT WAS SPEEDY_B NOT ME

By Zero061099 on 07.06.2007 - 02:06
umm apparently someone edit my post and made it "look" like i went to the conference! it was speedy_b that went....just want to give credit where credits due.....see original post that came from www.zero.editboard.com

actually if..........

By Zero061099 on 07.06.2007 - 02:06
u click the discussion at the bottom of this thread u will see my original post

boot issue

By Me on 07.06.2007 - 09:06
i don't get it, why woud ms want to target the bootup processes ? wasn't the issue for wga to target the fake oem by finding the bios emulation thing ? boot is what makes the computer start ? what's it got to do with anything ?

ActivateByPhone

By NoName on 07.06.2007 - 11:06
it's time to make a keygen to activate windows by phone...and all this have an end!!!

SO very TRUE !

By DarkPhat on 07.06.2007 - 11:06
yeah it is about time someone from one of the hacker communitie creates a keygen to activate windows vista by phone, microsoft will cry if that happens

Keygens may not work with activation processes

By Johnny on 07.06.2007 - 13:06
cause although keygens may generate legit keys, they may be legit keys that microsoft activation servers flag as not put out to public or sold, as like that not so legit!

Humans do humans crackz... :)

By Human on 07.06.2007 - 16:06
what humans make humans can break... :)
i'm not worried at all

have a nice day ya'll

Bad news about about SP1 for Vista

By swandike on 08.06.2007 - 08:06
i hate vista....so why bother what sp1 will do?

Refund!

By SlowHandLuke on 08.06.2007 - 15:06
i want my money back! oh wait i did not pay for anything.

Bad news about about SP1 for Vista

By geddeeee on 08.06.2007 - 16:06
why would i want sp1 when vista works fine at the moment? why this need to upgrade all the time. if it works, don't fix it!!!!

No Problemo

By The CAT on 09.06.2007 - 02:06
t's funny how people react to microsoft security enhancements. i have seen this story before, microsoft comes up with a new checkpoint and hackers rip it down within 24 hours. lets remember some of the previous follies

wga
vista activation - oops.....
windows xp sp2 - no go
windows xp sp1a - not quite
microsoft office various versions

end result, vista sp1 will be a joke. even if they managed to finally block out the hackers, disabling windows update will stop anything bill can throw at you. with paradox alone your invulnerable, just be smart, don't worry!!!

Also,,,

By The CAT on 09.06.2007 - 02:06
ed bott does us a service of talking about the failure called "microsoft product activation".

http://blogs.zdnet.com/bott/?p=219

Use modded bios

By sam on 09.06.2007 - 11:06
wot the hell 'll ms do if we use a modded bios to activate vista???ms really screwed by allowing oem activatn,,,,,,,,,

someone will crack it

By Wack0 on 10.06.2007 - 08:06
eth0 or some other scene group will crack that mangy wga protection.

vista duh

By XFX on 13.06.2007 - 00:06
i love windows vista !
but i hate the way ms is taking
......for any change it require you to activate or you are thift wtf

crackerz

By bomb on 13.06.2007 - 10:06
yeah! dont worry about what ms say, even if the releaase a new feature included in sp1 for vista somebody will always find the way to shut down wga..

i'm using vista ultimate at home and it works fine

no need for updates as long as you have the symantec antivirus for vista always up to date

because it require you to shut off auto update and firewall

symantec for vista have a firewall of its own thats why.

No need for a crack

By thedog on 24.06.2007 - 22:06
the feature that i've revealing today shows that microsoft has built into vista a function that allows anyone to extend the operating system's activation deadline not just three times, but many times. the same one-line command that postpones vista's activation deadline to 120 days can be used an indefinite number of times by first changing a registry key from 0 to 1.
step 1. while running a copy of windows vista that hasn't yet been activated, click the start button, type regedit into the search box, then press enter to launch the registry editor.

step 2. explore down to the following registry key:

hkey_local_machine \ software \ microsoft \ windows nt \ currentversion \ sl

step 3. right-click the registry key named skiprearm and click edit. the default is a dword (a double word or 4 bytes) with a hex value of 00000000. change this value to any positive integer, such as 00000001, save the change, and close the registry editor.

step 4. start a command prompt with administrative rights. the fastest way to do this is to click the start button, enter cmd in the search box, then press ctrl+shift+enter. if you're asked for a network username and password, provide the ones that log you into your domain. you may be asked to approve a user account control prompt and to provide an administrator password.

step 5. type one of the following two commands and press enter:

slmgr -rearm
or
rundll32 slc.dll,slrearmwindows

either command uses vista's built-in software licensing manager (slmgr) to push the activation deadline out to 30 days after the command is run. changing skiprearm from 0 to 1 allows slmgr to do this an indefinite number of times. running either command initializes the value of skiprearm back to 0.

step 6. reboot the pc to make the postponement take effect. (after you log in, if you like, you can open a command prompt and run the command slmgr -xpr to see vista's new expiration date and time. i explained the slmgr command and its parameters in my feb. 15 article.)

step 7. to extend the activation deadline of vista indefinitely, repeat steps 1 through 6 as necessary

No need for a crack

By The Poon Tamer on 25.06.2007 - 03:06
with comments i've read from ms, my guess is the infinate trial loophole will be closed also. no worries though, to date there hasn't been one ms program that hasn't been compromised....think thats gonna change??
and for the dope that says "who needs a sp1?"....maybe he should try running a non-service pack version of xp for a week....might change his view of why service packs are important. took 2 of em before xp was fully stable. now if they can only totally disable the uac in the service pack........that would make me happy......

Why not this way?

By PhoeniXor on 27.06.2007 - 23:06
why not chainload bootmgr with a patched bootmgr? as far as i know, loaders just rewrite the memory section of the bda, at bootup. isn´t bootmgr capable of chainloading another bootmgr on another partition?

grtz,
pxor


No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Discussion - Bad news about about SP1 for Vista