Why we banned Windows Vista
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 23.3.2007
Tip: Click here to update all your PC's outdated driversThe prestigious National Institute of Standards and Technology has put a ban on Windows Vista, but that's standard procedure, according to NIST's chief information officer.
NIST, which does research and sets standards for things like cryptography for government use, is among several federal agencies that have put a moratorium on the use of Vista. The agencies are taking some time to make sure that the new Microsoft operating system meets their needs.
It is not unusual that large organizations aren't rushing to install major software updates. These organizations tend to do a lot of testing before upgrading. The same happened when Microsoft released Windows XP, and again with Service Pack 2 for Windows XP. Microsoft widely released Vista in late January.
Simon Szykman, chief information officer at NIST, was slightly irked by some of the media reports on his agency's move, which painted the ban as a major slap in Microsoft's face. In fact, Szykman said, this is business as usual. Ultimately, NIST expects many of its PCs will run Vista. Still, Microsoft has predicted a swift adoption of Vista by businesses.
NIST, based in Gaithersburg, Md., employs about 2,900 people and has an additional group of about 1,800 visiting researchers who complement the staff. Szykman spoke with CNET News.com about his organization's plans for Vista.
Q: What is your current position on Windows Vista?
Szykman: Our policy states that we're not allowing users to install or deploy Windows Vista for the time being. We consider this to be an interim policy to give us the time to do the adequate testing of Vista before we deploy it. We don't expect to have any obstacles that would prevent us from eventually deploying Vista.
Does the same go for Office 2007 and Internet Explorer 7?
Szykman: For Office 2007, there is no policy to prevent individual users from purchasing and installing it, but we are not proactively rolling it out. On the issue of Internet Explorer 7, we have advised users not to upgrade to IE7 and are blocking downloads and automatic updates of IE7, again as an interim measure pending interoperability and compatibility testing. It is known that not all Web-based applications that run under IE 6 will function under IE 7, so we need to ensure that our critical business applications work, or are updated if initially they don't work, before deploying it internally.
How long does this process to test typically take?
Szykman: That is hard to say in advance. It can take several months to do all of the various types of testing that are needed. And also depending on what happens, it may be necessary to wait for Microsoft to issue fixes or updates before it is functional enough to use operationally.
What kind of things do you look for?
Szykman: We look at a variety of issues. We look at interoperability testing, whether Vista works well with our existing networks and other machines on the network. We look at application testing, to make sure that the critical business applications that we have will actually run under Vista. We look at the ability for us to adequately secure machines that are running Vista.
We also need to ensure, in addition to the applications, that there are drivers available for legacy equipment that we already have in place. We also need to ensure adequate training of not only the user community but our CIO staff so that we're prepared to respond to various troubleshooting and help requests, and the people here are also trained to do the deployment.
These are the kinds of issues that we need to be concerned with. It's not just having some music-ripping software on a computer that stops working in case of incompatibilities. We have business-critical applications, and if those stop working it gets in the way of doing our job.
Is there anything in particular in Vista that you like?
Szykman: The encryption capabilities that are built into Vista are potentially useful from the perspective of federal government mandates. It is hard to say until we've adequately looked into its functionality and effectiveness, but there is currently a mandate for encryption of certain types of information and the use of encryption on laptops, so that's potentially something that will be helpful.
source:
news.zdnet.com
>> Click Here to Run a Free Scan for PC Errors <<
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Instant Change Vista Product ID with Vista ProductID Changer || x64 Vista SP2 JPG Rendering Performance Inferior to x86 Vista SP2's || Check for RAM Error or Defect in Windows 7 and Vista with Windows Memory Diagnostic || AeroBar: Show Titlebar Text in Explorer Windows Under Windows Vista || Windows Vista and Windows Server 2008 SP2 reaches RTM
Comments(6)
i think the media is blowing things out of proportion (again).
i remember when xp
came out, the media
did the exact same thing. win2000 was what a lot of people (in
the business community) were using, and they had a wait and see attitude until their
respective it departments made sure that
their systems could handle,and there were
no problems.
it's getting to the point you can't find any good information out of
the media.
these guys are idiots. did they even think about the people that already have it?
his family actually using it since the release. what a language of the libertards and
democrabs!
this is only half the article. here's the rest:
is there anything in vista that
might make you postpone upgrading to it?
szykman: nothing that i'm aware of in
advance. we'll have to see what happens with the testing, and interoperability, and
availability of drivers and our applications to run on it and so on. but at the moment,
we're not anticipating any specific obstacles.
do you have any particular
concerns that you're going into the test with?
szykman: i don't think there are
any predispositions or any particular hot issues. we're going into it with a relatively
open mind as well as just looking forward to seeing what comes out of it.
do
you have a lot of homegrown applications?
szykman: we have some, but for the most
part we deal with commercial off-the-shelf software whenever we can. there are some
applications that are tailored to our requirements.
in the past, how long have
your testing cycles been for a new operating system update?
szykman: i haven't been
through an equivalent testing cycle here. what i can say from common practices is that it
is typical for this to take some months. sometimes the deployment will wait until after a
service pack is released. in cases where people do decide to wait for a service pack,
it's because they're expecting the service pack to address issues that they view as
holding up their deployment.
do you feel that microsoft is helping you out?
are they involved at all with what you're doing?
szykman: our testing is internal,
but microsoft certainly has expressed a willingness to work with customers both at nist
and across the federal government. we don't see any difficulty in working with them.
microsoft is not pressuring you into upgrading sooner?
szykman: not at
all. they're fully respectful of customers making these types of choices and they
certainly understand the need for testing before deployment when you're talking about
large, managed organizations.
have you used vista yourself?
szykman: i
have not.
what operating systems do you use mostly at nist?
szykman:
primarily windows, but not exclusively. we also have linux users, macintosh users, and
people who use other flavors of unix.
would you ever consider moving to a
predominantly linux, mac os or other operating system environment?
szykman: there's
nothing in place that would prevent that from happening. it really depends on what the
business requirements are and what people choose to use. there's no obstacle to more
people using other operating systems. people are able to use the operating systems they
choose.
are you happy with what windows xp does for you today?
szykman:
so far that is supporting a majority of our population and it has been working fine.
does it make sense to upgrade to vista if xp is not broken?
szykman: that's
true, except that it's just part of a natural refresh cycle, and we expect vista to start
coming into our infrastructure in an increasing way as part of the natural refresh cycle.
this is just part of the way business is done. it is part of a cycle and lifecycle of
management of it. hardware gets refreshed, software gets refreshed, applications get
upgraded, and operating systems get upgraded. certainly there are hiccups here and there,
but that's the case with every instance or every step in the process.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6169618.html
from the corporate perspective, everything that szykman says makes perfect sense. why
would you unleash a new os without waiting for some statistical evidence of how it
performs in an organizational environment? god forbid someone applies a little logic to
doing business...
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
Windows 7 RTM 7600.16385.090713-1255 HERE !
no big deal
By p51d007 on 23.03.2007 - 17:03