Vista Sales Estimates Indicate Dwindling Retail Channel
section: windows, for your questions: KezNews forum, 16.2.2007
Tip: Click here to update all your PC's outdated driversComparing preliminary information released by NPD this morning regarding launch week sales for Microsoft Windows Vista versus historical NPD data for prior years, BetaNews has learned the news for Microsoft may seem even more daunting than at first believed:
Though unit sales for Vista's launch week decreased 58.9% over the launch week of Windows XP in October 2001, the way NPD tabulates its launch week data -- the methodology for which NPD confirmed to BetaNews this afternoon -- indicates that retail unit sales of Vista may actually be 25% or less per day during Vista's launch week than for XP's.
As NPD analyst David Riley told BetaNews, NPD has always tabulated weeks as periods extending from Sunday to the following Saturday, regardless of what day the product may have actually launched. So a "launch week" is not seven days' worth of data.
Previous NPD data reported that Windows XP sold around 300,000 copies during its launch week. But with XP launching on a Thursday, that figure only accounted for three days of sales. Windows 98 sold 400,000 during its launch week in June 1998, although it was also launched on a Thursday. Windows Me, which was an admittedly lackluster launch of about 200,000 copies, first hit shelves in September 2000...on a Thursday. Windows Vista launched on Tuesday, January 30, so NPD's sales figures - which analysts confirmed today - accounts for a full five days of sales.
If those preliminary figures stand up, retail copies of Vista may be selling fewer than 25,000 copies per day - one-fourth of XP's estimated retail sales during its launch week. - for a total of under 125,000 copies for the week.
But does this really mean Vista is less popular? According to this morning's memo from NPD analyst Chris Swenson, the firm's retail point-of-sale dataset is comprised of data submitted by major US retailers, including both online retailers such as Amazon and storefronts such as Best Buy, Circuit City, CompUSA, and office supply stores. With just that knowledge in hand, two factors may help compensate for what otherwise would appear terrible news:
* First, the download channel may be more popular, as XP owners could be finding it easier to simply buy and burn the disc themselves than drive home with a useless box.
* Second, Windows Vista's launch is the first to have been split between business and consumers, with businesses having gained access starting last November. In 2001, many small businesses still upgraded to XP by driving down to Best Buy and picking up a copy, as many per-hour computer consultants at that time would attest. With Vista Enterprise's capability to be installed by way of a server through a company network, enterprises may now have more incentive to download the operating system now - since prices are not likely to decline - and implement their network migrations on a per-seat basis using the Software Assurance program, even though the migration process may take years.
NPD itself may have provided some evidence to back up the contention that retail customers represent a smaller segment of the overall market than before, with its revelation last month that commercial sales of Vista reaped 62.5% more revenue for Microsoft during the complete first month of March than did Windows 2000 during its first complete month of sales in March 2000.
Of course, Vista's average selling prices are as much as two-thirds higher as well, which evens things out significantly. But judging from Vista's total sales just to businesses in January, NPD's Swenson estimated last month that this figure was only lower than XP's total sales to all customers in November 2001, by a meager 3.7%.
>> Click Here to Run a Free Scan for PC Errors <<
Send link 2 friend | Permalink
MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Windows 7 sales exceed Vista sales by 234% || Microsoft now hiring for retail stores || Images of Zune HD Retail Packaging Leaked || Windows 7 retail boxes begin surfacing in stores || Windows 7 7600 Golden Build - Retail + Windows Server 2008 r2 RTM
Comments(9)
i'm no expert, but i'm guessing that's it's a multi-part problem because 1) higher system requirements 2)
incompatible hardware and software 3) drastically high cost 4) xp still performs tasks fine and no huge
benefit to spend all the needed money to go to vista, which does not perform as well.
use vista before you start saying it is crap and is not as good because you know what? i think you have never
tried a real vista on the right hardware, most people complaining have crap computers, get with the times.
my system with vista performs better as xp, so....
i have a dual core a 7600 and 2 gig of ram. vista does not perfom as well when.... playing game loading
windows media player / vedios, dreamscene s**ks a** with performance unleess its a real shit quality mepg, and
my athanlon 3000+ boots faster, the only reason vista preforms better ovaerll that begining what i use it most
for broswing folders word etc is cos it is better desgined for dual core
your issues are all releated to the total crap that is nvidia's current vista driver base. i have a similar
box with and ati card, and everything runs perfectly, and i get the same framerate in games as i did under xp.
people to back me up, vista is better!
using vista on my 6 month old asus laptop and when running vista the battery only last 1/2 an hour,there are
too many programs and resources running in the background.change back to xp and battery life is back to 3
hours.
...the reason a lot of people are getting so up tight about defending vista and over anyone having anything
but a positive opinion on it is that some of these people have spent the approx £350 on it, and will now do
anything to justify that large expense. even if it means not allowing people the freedom to have the opinion
that it's complete crap. same problems from the linux fanboys when people come to try a new os, and it
doesnt work - yes technically most of it is down to drivers, but no one cares about that in real life, to
99.9999% of people all they care about is "does it work?" and regardless of who is at fault, if it doesn't
work well, then people cant be bothered with it, cos they want their hardware to work as it should. that is
the reason i had to go back to xp, there are no "good" soundmax drivers, a lot of programs dont work
properly. but i too get flamed for being anti-vista! it's ridiculous, stop trying to justify to everyone
else that you made the so called right decision in your purchase. and if you would read a hell of a lot of
reviews online, and news, vista is not doing so well, and it's been proven over and over that due to buggy
code, and crap drivers it's simply not ready, and even on the odd systems it does work great on, it still
games at around 10% slower than xp did, and is still full of drm!
i got my vista free, so did loads of other people, so all what you just said is bull crap, my vista runs
faster than any other os i have tried.
No new comments are allowed for this article.
For your questions use our KezNews Forum
Just a wild guess here...
By ScytheNoire on 16.02.2007 - 14:02