KezNews.com
DownloadsOther NewsForumBlogsWallpapersJokewareSearch

News letter:


Enter Your E-mail:

Windows 7 RTM Build 7260 download x32 and x64 HERE !

How to activate Windows 7 RC build 7229, 7231 and olders


Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2

section: download, for your questions: KezNews forum, 18.11.2006

    Tip: Click here to update all your PC's outdated drivers

Second Little path for BillGates ISO of Windows Vista RTM to transform this release into legit MSDN release.




Info By 420

I'm comparing "BillGates+old MSDN patch" to this real MSDN version. I don't have the unpatched BillGates anymore but I know that "BillGates+old MSDN patch" is closer to real MSDN than just BillGates with no patch.
The old patch changed 3 files. Well, 2 files but 1 was in 2 different places.
Now, if you apply the new patch to the unpatched BillGates or if you download the official MSDN version like I did, then the only difference between the real MSDN version and the "BillGates+old MSDN patch" version is the file "migcore.dll". It's located in:

sources/migcore.dll
support/migwiz/migcore.dll

And here are the differences:

OLD:
0x001D5D1D 4570 1697
0x001D5D55 4570 1697

NEW:
0x001D5D1D C0A8 0001
0x001D5D55 C0A8 0001

Microsoft.Windows.Vista.Final-BillGates (LRMCFRE_EN_DVD.iso) to Legit.MSDN.Vista (en_windows_vista_x86_dvd_X12-34293.iso).

Installation:

Start ppf-o-matic3
Choose ISO of BillGates Release (LRMCFRE_EN_DVD.iso SHA-1 b82590481755ba3420e7314bf82b8916a90963b5)
choose patch real.ppf
Click Apply and your done

YOU HAVE A Legit.MSDN.Vista ISO with SHA-1 b71e04564ca22e4d9928e59298eff87cf62b382b

Download:
Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2
Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2
Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2
Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2 (torrent)

View: KezNews Discussion - Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2

  >> Click Here to Run a Free Scan for PC Errors <<

send email Send link 2 friend  |  Permalink
<< previouse article
Playstation 3 Launches in North America
next article >>
Virtual Earth 3D (Beta)

MORE RELATED ARTICLES:
Windows 7 Beta ISO Download and Product Key Available for MSDN and Technet Subsribers || Windows 7 beta on MSDN? || Windows Vista Service Pack 2 -SP2 Beta Standalone DVD ISO || Windows Vista with SP2 RTM Slipstreamed/Integrated DVD ISO Image || Windows Home Server - Now available on MSDN

Comments (110) showed (40) - Show all comments

By on 19.11.2006 - 01:11
whats differnt ?

MR MODARATOR READ THIS

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 01:11
why you change the readme file of my pach?
i release it here so everyone enjoys the real billgates to msdn patch.

guys here is the original readme file made by me legitcyx:

real msdn patch

microsoft.windows.vista.final-billgates (lrmcfre_en_dvd.iso)
to
legit.msdn.vista (en_windows_vista_x86_dvd_x12-34293.iso)
by legitcyx



installation:

start ppf-o-matic3
choose iso of billgates release (lrmcfre_en_dvd.iso sha-1 b82590481755ba3420e7314bf82b8916a90963b5)
choose patch real.ppf
click apply and your done

you have a legit.msdn.vista iso with sha-1 b71e04564ca22e4d9928e59298eff87cf62b382b
enjoy!!!!





Original Download Location

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 01:11
http://rapidshare.com/files/3890509/workingmsdn.rar

checksum

By Tim on 19.11.2006 - 02:11
hi legitcyx.

i dont understand one thing. the previous patch, had the original checksum of the bill gates version in "c7792c31aeea98be645ab295d35e8eef".

why the "before" checksum of your bill gates version is different? there are 2 bill gates versions?

the previously patch worked with this original checksum "c7792c31aeea98be645ab295d35e8eef".

i cant apply yours, cause the original versions seem to be diferent.

could you please explain me that?

thanks

checksum

By graf on 19.11.2006 - 04:11
i tried to check checksum before and after and it saying 1 error detected.

the difference?

By cool on 19.11.2006 - 04:11
whats the difference between this and the first patch?

Re: checksum

By Ducky on 19.11.2006 - 05:11
the difference in the checksum is due to the different checksum type used, if you scan it again using 'sha-1' instead of md5 you'll get the matching checksum provided you have the correct release.

upgrade install error

By Richo on 19.11.2006 - 08:11
does this fix the error when upgrading from within xp? at 50% the install stops and gives an error message. however, if you do a clean install from boot up it works fine.

exact procedure

By freesoftware on 19.11.2006 - 08:11
just to be clear, after patching the iso image, install.
upon key request do you enter a key or not, after installation, how do you activate?

already applied?

By asdffdsa on 19.11.2006 - 09:11
i wish there was a patch for those of us who already applied the last one.

RE:Difference

By 420 on 19.11.2006 - 09:11
okay, there is only one file that is different.
i'm comparing "billgates+old msdn patch" to this real msdn version. i don't have the unpatched billgates anymore but i know that "billgates+old msdn patch" is closer to real msdn than just billgates with no patch.
the old patch changed 3 files. well, 2 files but 1 was in 2 different places.
now, if you apply the new patch to the unpatched billgates or if you download the official msdn version like i did, then the only difference between the real msdn version and the "billgates+old msdn patch" version is the file "migcore.dll". it's located in:
sources/migcore.dll
support/migwiz/migcore.dll

and here are the differences:

old:
0x001d5d1d 4570 1697
0x001d5d55 4570 1697

new:
0x001d5d1d c0a8 0001
0x001d5d55 c0a8 0001

Right

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 11:11
exactly these are the difference between the billgates and the msdn version.i have nothing to add 420 analyze it and is correct.

These are the files that we should all have:

By 420 on 19.11.2006 - 11:11
en_windows_vista_x86_dvd_x12-34293.iso - have
en_windows_vista_x64_dvd_x12-40712.iso - want

So What?!?

By Radiance on 19.11.2006 - 12:11
but if you have a msdn vista, what's the difference you still wont be able to activate of pass wga with it.

RE: So What?!?

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 12:11
to clear something the release of the patch was to just convert the billgates to real msdn version of vista for just testing purpose.i dont support piracy.

My checksum is different

By BGmon on 19.11.2006 - 12:11
i thought i had bill gates' release but after applying the patch the checksum of my new file is d1ff9802d93871c9b90fe5542e84f89e

will this not work?

How about winbeta version

By Neta on 19.11.2006 - 12:11
how about the winbeta version x86 and x64, dos it has the same bug that the billgates version has? can i aply this same patch to it?

Nope

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 13:11
the patch was created and tested for billgates release only.it will not work for other releases.

How about winbeta version

By Neta on 19.11.2006 - 13:11
ok.. but does the winbeta version has the same bug? does it need to be repaired anyway?
thanks.

RE: How about winbeta version

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 13:11
i dont know.i dont have winbeta version

 

By 420 on 19.11.2006 - 13:11
the winbeta (at least the x86 part of it) has the same files as the original unpatched billgates release.

Patch

By Telos on 19.11.2006 - 15:11
is there a patch to go from billgates+old msdn patch to correct msdn version? i don't want to download the billgates version again.

Does This Really Work?

By Geagan on 19.11.2006 - 15:11
can somebody who has installed vista after using this patch please tell us if it works. does it or does it not need a key for activation after installation? and, can you use it beyond the 30 day limit?

RE: Patch

By LeGITcyX on 19.11.2006 - 16:11
telos i may release a patch to undo old msdn patch.if you have a billgates+old msdn patch to convert it back to original billgates

got to reinstall

By wackey on 19.11.2006 - 16:11
hi all....just got an question here, i am running vista6000 now, when i apply the patch, do i have to reinstall vista?

thnx

wait

By Dreamer on 19.11.2006 - 16:11
isn't a better way that you just install normal billgates vista and when you are asked for key you don't enter it to get trial version. you can extend 30 days to 60 or 90 (not sure) in command prompt. in this time it will surely came some crack for vista.
am i right?

asking for key

By wackey on 19.11.2006 - 18:11
i just did an vista6000 patch and i reinstalled it and it is still asking for an key...what do i do?
select no?

thnx

RE: Patch

By Telos on 19.11.2006 - 18:11
legitcyx, that undo patch would be really welcome. it would save me from redownloading the entire file to get less then a 1mb of differences.

?????

By mETALFUZIOn on 19.11.2006 - 19:11
i really donīt see eny benefits on doing the transformation of the bill gates version into msdn, if it is only the possibility to install it from xp??

i got old patch

By cake on 19.11.2006 - 19:11
i got the old patch, can i still install this one over the first one or cant i? do i have to dl bg again? thansk

is there a REAL LONG LASTING fix for vista yet?

By JohnnyC on 19.11.2006 - 19:11
so you guys that are running vista 6000 now.....

is there a real long lasting fix that will let us run vista for years to come, or is it some 30 day trick you can do 2-3 times or something?

THE REAL SOLUTION IS HERE!!!!

By pelopidas on 19.11.2006 - 19:11
ok, i think the time has come!!!

go in torrent file in the end of my message, get it, read the doc files (important!!!) and open the file in folder "standarduserproductactivation"

its an html file, test it with anything you want, its clear!!!

lets all say a big hello!!! to bill!!!

http://www.mininova.org/tor/489491

files from 'pelopidas'

By SugaDaddy on 19.11.2006 - 20:11
i downloaded the files from 'pelopidas', can anybody explain in a few words what this 'activation' is all about and if it works?
i don't unterstand everyting in the .doc-files and don't know how this 'activation' works.

thanks a lot!

files from 'pelopidas'

By pelopidas on 19.11.2006 - 20:11
the file it isnt mine, i am not the man who uploaded.
i just found it in mininova and just tell it here to all users
the uploader is unknown to me and in mininova there isnt any nickname for him, but it seems he have some good access to ms files...

RE: files from 'pelopidas'

By SugaDaddy on 19.11.2006 - 21:11
i don't complain, i just want to know if there is anybody who understands what's in the .doc-files and can explain it so that everybody understands...
@pelopidas: i know that these files aren't yours, i just wrote 'files from pelopidas' so everybody knows what files i'm talking about. thanks for your investigation!

Whats the differance

By gavincol78 on 19.11.2006 - 21:11
i would like to know what the patching does to the os. i am currantly running vista 6000 bill gates version with the activation crack where you activate it with rc1 patch files and key (the downside with this method is you get windows vista (tm) evaluation copy. build 600 in the bottom corner.

VISTA Activation and Deployment Learning Reversing

By MikeW on 19.11.2006 - 21:11
that doc is from ms. in short, you must activate your vista, no matter whicherver edition you have.

in the past, we can use leaked vlk (volume licenseing, aka corporation edition) to bypass activation problem. beginning with vista, ms has done so called "vlk v2", that is, even volume licneseing version has to be activated (in 2 ways). it seems ms also has controlled over how many times per key can be used to activate. that's why no legit key has been leaked so far. (it's like warcraft cdkey.)

 

By 420 on 19.11.2006 - 21:11
i'm gonna try it out and i'll let you guys know what's up.

 

By 420 on 19.11.2006 - 22:11
it's an interesting file, but we still need a key. the rc1&2 keys don't work.

Aftter patching

By kick on 19.11.2006 - 23:11
after patching billgates iso, is it suppose to change the name or still be called the first thing it was?



Show all comments


No new comments are allowed for this article.

For your questions use our KezNews Discussion - Windows Vista Iso BillGates to MSDN patch 2